<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Version of jQuery Infinite Carousel on the Way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.catchmyfame.com/2009/12/22/new-version-of-jquery-infinite-carousel-on-the-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.catchmyfame.com/2009/12/22/new-version-of-jquery-infinite-carousel-on-the-way/</link>
	<description>A web designoper&#039;s journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:04:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vbs</title>
		<link>http://www.catchmyfame.com/2009/12/22/new-version-of-jquery-infinite-carousel-on-the-way/comment-page-1/#comment-12862</link>
		<dc:creator>vbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 13:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catchmyfame.com/?p=410#comment-12862</guid>
		<description>Hi!

Great Carousel, I&#039;m loving it!

I just want to report you a little bug: the &lt;i&gt;displayProgressBar: true;&lt;/i&gt; makes Firefox to consume high cpu (about 30% on phenom II 965 processor) and IE8 consumes about 22-25%. If property disabled the cpu load is back to normal (10% only when linear ease between images).

I&#039;ll be happy if you can resolve that little bug for the very next version. :)

PS: I&#039;m using your Carousel with Fancybox integration. If you think that my comment is inappropriate, feel free to delete it but keep in mind the bug ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p>
<p>Great Carousel, I&#8217;m loving it!</p>
<p>I just want to report you a little bug: the <i>displayProgressBar: true;</i> makes Firefox to consume high cpu (about 30% on phenom II 965 processor) and IE8 consumes about 22-25%. If property disabled the cpu load is back to normal (10% only when linear ease between images).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be happy if you can resolve that little bug for the very next version. :)</p>
<p>PS: I&#8217;m using your Carousel with Fancybox integration. If you think that my comment is inappropriate, feel free to delete it but keep in mind the bug ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.catchmyfame.com/2009/12/22/new-version-of-jquery-infinite-carousel-on-the-way/comment-page-1/#comment-10403</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 18:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catchmyfame.com/?p=410#comment-10403</guid>
		<description>** a div tag instead of an img tag I mean..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>** a div tag instead of an img tag I mean..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.catchmyfame.com/2009/12/22/new-version-of-jquery-infinite-carousel-on-the-way/comment-page-1/#comment-10402</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 18:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catchmyfame.com/?p=410#comment-10402</guid>
		<description>Great Work on the Carousel.  One request, can you make the captions animate/scroll with their associated images instead of dropping down then back up? It seems that would make more sense.  

Also, since you allow html in the caption, can you also make a version of the carousel that can use an instead of an  tag?  We may not always want to have a carousel of images.  For example I might want to have an image, and some rating or other content scroll with the image all as one unit.  The non image content would not really be a caption.  So instead of having the  tag be the units of the carousel, can we also have a fixed size ? That would be great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Work on the Carousel.  One request, can you make the captions animate/scroll with their associated images instead of dropping down then back up? It seems that would make more sense.  </p>
<p>Also, since you allow html in the caption, can you also make a version of the carousel that can use an instead of an  tag?  We may not always want to have a carousel of images.  For example I might want to have an image, and some rating or other content scroll with the image all as one unit.  The non image content would not really be a caption.  So instead of having the  tag be the units of the carousel, can we also have a fixed size ? That would be great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

